|
CFD Review |
|
|
Site Sponsors |
|
|
Tell a Friend |
|
|
|
Help this site to grow by sending a friend an
invitation to visit this site.
|
|
|
|
|
CFD News by Email |
|
|
|
Did you know that you can get today's CFD Review headlines mailed to your inbox?
Just log in and select Email Headlines Each Night on your User Preferences page.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
CFD Improves Ultra High Fuel Economy Vehicle |
|
|
|
|
Originally, the aerodynamic design of our car, named 'Eco-Veículo', was based on our experience in aerodynamics and some numerical simulations using our in-house Navier-Stokes solver on a structured grid to tune certain aspects of the car shape. The limitations of the solver created convergence problems and we could not achieve the expected results. Predictions of the drag coefficient were almost
70% in excess of what we felt to be the correct figure. We built the car and, in three attempts, achieved 42nd, 30th and 14th places. To improve our ranking, a better aerodynamic design was needed.
We built a 1:2.5 model and measured total force and pressure distribution in a wind tunnel. We then decided to use CFX-5.5 to predict the aerodynamic coefficients of the existing car. The unstructured grid made quite a difference and convergence was no longer a problem. After grid independence tests, where grid inflation parameters played a major role, we studied the role of advection schemes and turbulence models. We found the Shear Stress Transport (SST) model, combined with a second-order advection scheme, clearly produced the best results (calculated CD of 0.09 compared to a measured value of 0.1).
Due to time constraints, we could not realistically build a new car for this year's contest so we made some small modifications to the existing tail and wheel covers based on CFX results. Our participation at the 2002 Shell Eco-Marathon was much more successful; we were third among the universities, with a personal record of 1734km from one liter of fuel. Compared to last year's 1286km/l, this represents an increase in efficiency of 35% as a result of using CFX.
With these encouraging results, we used CFX-5 to design a new car shape. This took almost three months, and we tested some 15 to 20 different shapes. A systematic optimization was done, starting from the general shape and camberline, ending in the detail optimization of the wheel covers and nose shape. This led us to an improvement of 20% in fuel efficiency relatively to the previous car. We will see next year how our new car performs at the contest!
The "Eco Veículo Mondego XC01".
Flow streamlines over the body surface colored by surface shear stress.
Top view - velocity distribution in a horizontal plane at the nose level.
Surface pressure coefficient distribution at the car symmetry plane. Numerical values computed with the Shear Stress Transport turbulence model and second-order advection scheme.
|
|
|
|
[ Post Comment ]
< A Mesh Generator for Heat Exchangers | CFdesign Partners with 3 MCAD Leaders at NDES > | |
|
CFD Review Login |
|
|
Related Links |
|
|